Just war is a term which implies that a certain war is acceptable and justifiable based on certain conditions.The conditions for having a just war include those which must be visible before a war can be declared (Jus Ad Bellum) as well as those that must be followed during a war (Jus In Bello).Some of the conditions that are necessary before war is declared include having a just cause for war, having the right intentions for war, and having no other alternative but war (1).Tags: Argument Of Definition Essay ExamplesArgumentative Essay On Cyber Crime LawSolar Panels Business PlanCivil Rights Research PaperAntithesis And OxymoronCollege Short Response EssayProfessional Resume And Cover Letter WritingComputer Studies Coursework 2011Three Words To Describe Myself Essay
If the two nations indeed exaggerated the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, it would be even more reason for the international community to be apprehensive about Bush’s ”pre-emptive strike” doctrine.. that after such a war Britain would not be in the ... Saddam Hussein has "Weapons of Mass Destruction ...
, though it doesn't justify their act of violence, ... stating that Iraq must show proof that these weapons are destroyed.
Is this war with Iraq justifiable, or has America jumped into something that could have possibly been avoided?
To answer these questions a comparison should be made between the characteristics of this war and those that constitute a just war.
If these characteristics are put up against the United States and their strikes on Iraq, there is absolutely no way that the just war theory could classify this war as being just.
The primary criterion for any war to be labeled as a just war is for that war to be declared for a just cause.But Britain’s Parliament has decided to conduct an inquiry into whether Blair was right in deciding to wage war.In the United States, the Defense Intelligence Agency has recently admitted having compiled a report last fall that included an analysis concluding there was no solid evidence to substantiate a claim that Iraq had chemical weapons.The dossier also stated Iraq had the means to deploy chemical and biological weapons ”within 45 minutes.’ ‘ But according to the BBC, this part of the report was ”amended” by the prime minister’s office to make it more impressive, and a senior intelligence officer has admitted the fabrication.”Completely and totally untrue,’ ‘ British Prime Minister Tony Blair said in dismissing allegations his government had overstated Iraq’s weapons capability to justify the war..pass_color_to_child_links a.u-inline.u-margin-left--xs.u-margin-right--sm.u-padding-left--xs.u-padding-right--xs.u-absolute.u-absolute--center.u-width--100.u-flex-align-self--center.u-flex-justify--between.u-serif-font-main--regular.js-wf-loaded .u-serif-font-main--regular.amp-page .u-serif-font-main--regular.u-border-radius--ellipse.u-hover-bg--black-transparent.web_page .u-hover-bg--black-transparent:hover. Content Header .feed_item_answer_user.js-wf-loaded . When the International Atomic Energy Agency analyzed the document upon which the dossier was based, however, the document itself was found to be a fabrication. Also according to this article the eradication of biological weapons in Iraq may be as important or more important to the people ... But no evidence has been published in support of that theory, but American experts say, and United Nations inspectors found ...about in Britain, research and intelligence experts, also convinced that there are more germ warfare agents left in Iraq than previously ...The Senate is looking into the accuracy of the intelligence the government was given. Bush counters criticism from Congress and in the media by saying the war liberated the people of Iraq.He is obviously determined to justify his action, even if no weapons of mass destruction turn up. was justified in going to war with Mexico because ... The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico.