Memory and perception coincide, and together with the experiences relative to them they seem almost like writing statements in the soul.
When this ‘writing experience’ writes truly, then true judgements and true statements are formed within us as the consequence of its work – but when the scribe within us writes falsely, the result is the opposite.
For, I do not think Aristotle would, or need, deny that any of the following expressed a judgement: “This piece of cheese look green tomorrow”, “the wine tasted bitter yesterday”.
What he is concerned to deny is that my being appeared to in a green or bitter way is an exercise of judgement.
First, his requirements for the ideal city must be discussed.
Plato believed that the best city would be one that possessed the ability to defend itself from attackers and to be ruled by a person who would strive for the good of the citizens.(In the last two cases Aristotle would have said that we have intuition and scientific knowledge respectively.) This contrast does not commit Aristotle to the view that the concept, e.g.“being appeared to in a blue way” cannot be exercised in a judgement.(ii) We also have an apt way of expressing Aristotle’s account of appearing, that is given later in this chapter, and which is couched in explicitly causal terms.2 Aristotle has various arguments to show that ) rightly or wrongly.It is not, therefore, for him sense-perception, opinion (judgement), scientific knowledge or intuition.It is clear, isn’t it, that they may all be found within the soul both as false and as true?” “The thought,” he explains, “and the statement (expressing the thought) differ only in that while the former is a silent converse of the soul with itself (the speaking in one’s heart, as we may say, but oneself, which is quite different), the latter is a spoken flow of thought.While others practiced paganism and worshipped the Gods of Olympus, philosophers thought about the body, the soul, and ways to create a better world.Greek philosophers are still known today and their works are still being read and taught. One topic that philosophers frequently discuss is politics and government. Is the one they have now satisfactory or could it be better?In part I of this paper my aim is to elucidate a certain argument of Aristotle’s against an account of appearing that can, I think, be attributed to Plato. the state or capacity in virtue of which we say we have an image, or, as I would prefer to say, ” the state or capacity in virtue of which we say we are appeared to in such and such a way”.In part II I proceed to apply this argument to a view of sense impressions recently put forward by D. Translating the word “” as “presentation”.1 I feel we must avoid the odd procedure of translating “phantasia” with a word that has very different uses from the Greek one, and then, in order to avoid misunderstanding and nonsense, having to exclude from our minds the ordinary uses of “imagination”, and, especially, of the verb “to imagine”!