The Logical Problem Of Evil Essay

The Logical Problem Of Evil Essay-1
First, it's important to distinguish between two kinds of evil: moral evil and natural evil.Moral evil results from the actions of free creatures. Natural evil results from natural processes such as earthquakes and floods.

Tags: Phd Thesis In Industrial Engineering And ManagementMy Family Essay In AfrikaansScholarship For WomenServices Cover Letter PrincetonDissertation WebsiteEssay On Evolution Of ScienceFree Business Plan Template Uk Small BusinessCriminal Law Dissertation TopicsThe Essays Of Brother Anonymous

Certainly, God is capable of destroying evil--but not without destroying human freedom, or a world in which free creatures can function.

And most agree that this line of reasoning does successfully respond to the challenge of the logical problem of evil.

For what valid reason would a good and powerful God allow the amount and kinds of evil which we see around us? True, Scripture states that "with God all things are possible" (Mt. But Scripture also states that there are some things God cannot do. In other words, He cannot do anything that is "out of character" for a righteous God.

These issues are of an extremely important nature--not only as we seek to defend our belief in God, but also as we live out our Christian lives. Neither can He do anything that is out of character for a rational being in a rational world.

John Stott has said that "the fact of suffering undoubtedly constitutes the single greatest challenge to the Christian faith." It is unquestionably true that there is no greater obstacle to faith than that of the reality of evil and suffering in the world.

Indeed, even for the believing Christian, there is no greater test of faith than this--that the God who loves him permits him to suffer, at times in excruciating ways.

Here it is important first to recognize that we live in a fallen world, and that we are subject to natural disasters that would not have occurred had man not chosen to rebel against God.

Even so, it is difficult to imagine how we could function as free creatures in a world much different than our own--a world in which consistent natural processes allow us to predict with some certainty the consequences of our choices and actions. This is a natural process without which we could not possibly function as human beings, yet under some circumstances it is also capable of resulting in great harm.

Creatures who are free to follow His will must also be free to reject it.

And when people act in ways outside the will of God, great evil and suffering is the ultimate result.


Comments The Logical Problem Of Evil Essay

  • The Logical Problem of Evil

    The concept of evil has over the years been debated as to what extent that the undesirable affairs has lead to the notion that God may not be in existence. This is in regard to the problem of evil presence, which plays the key part over the issue of existence of God. The argument for…

  • The Problem of Evil -

    We will address both aspects of the problem of evil in this essay. It's also helpful to distinguish between two types of the philosophical or apologetic aspect of the problem of evil. The first is the logical challenge to belief in God. This challenge says it is irrational and hence impossible to believe in the existence of a good and powerful God on the basis of the existence of evil in the.…

  • Essay on The Argument Of The Logical Problem Of Evil

    Essay The Problem Of Evil. Préciso of The Problem of Evil In Rowe’s work, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism, he discusses three interrelated questions which are the following 1 Is there an argument for atheism based on the existence of evil that may rationally justify someone in…

  • Dangerous idea The Logical Problem of Evil and the.

    You are conflating the evidential or probabilistic argument from evil which is based on the existence of gratuitous evils and the logical problem of evil, which is based on the existence of evil simpliciter. Mackie's claim is that there is a broad logical inconsistency in God existing along with evil simpliciter not gratuitous evil. In response, all one needs to show is that it is.…

  • The Problem of Evil - Existence of God

    The most weighty of the arguments against God’s existence is the problem of evil. Of all the atheistic arguments, this is the one that has been around for longest, that has had the most words written about it, and that draws the most diverse responses from Christians.…

  • Problem of Evil Responses Introduction to Philosophy

    Problem of Evil Responses. Generally, a defense against the problem of evil may refer to attempts to defuse the logical problem of evil by showing that there is no logical incompatibility between the existence of evil and the existence of God. This task does not require the identification of a plausible explanation of evil, and is successful if the explanation provided shows that the.…

  • Essay about The Problem of Evil in Philosophy - 550 Words.

    Essay The Philosophy Of Religion The Problem Of Evil. In the philosophy of religion, “The problem of evil” is the question of how to reunite the existence of evil with that of a God who is a being with unlimited power, and has the knowledge of everything that there is to know.…

  • Logical Argument from Evil - Atheism

    According to logical arguments from evil, some known fact about evil is logically incompatible with God's existence. In contrast, evidential arguments from evil merely claim that some known fact about evil is evidence for God's nonexistence. Ever since Alvin Plantinga rebutted J. L. Mackie's…

  • John Mackie and Alvin Plantinga Arguments on the Problem.

    The problem of evil, therefore, tries to show that there is no logical way in which good and evil can exist in the way they are presented in religion. This paper will discuss the problem of evil, state the main claims that have been argued by John Mackie and Alvin Plantinga, and show some of the arguments that other scholars have raised with regard to the problem of evil.…

  • The Problem of Evil Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    In section 1.3, it was argued that concrete formulations of the argument from evil, which focus upon specific evils, or else upon narrowly defined types of evils, are superior to abstract formulations of the argument from evil, which start out from very general statements concerning evil—such as that there is evil in the world, or that there are natural evils, or that there is an enormous.…

The Latest from ©