By looking at a great example of an animal testing argumentative essay, you can learn a lot about the structure of such a paper.
You can use the sample written by our expert academic writers for free.
The Humane Society of the United States promotes research methods that can potentially replace, reduce, or refine animal use so that animals experience less suffering.
An opinion poll was taken by the HSUS on September 23, 2001 on pain and distress in research.
This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
Approximately two to four million animals have been used in safety tests.However, evidence shows that companies can use various other methods to test their products.And in most cases, those methods are more reliable than animal testing.They don’t have enough experience with academic writing to be able to write efficiently.However, there is something you can do to significantly speed things up.If nobody would buy these products, the companies would be forced to chance their texting methodology.The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong.Conclusion In conclusion, it is morally wrong to test new products and substances on animals, even if it is to make the product safe for human use.More and more people are opposing animal testing and many companies have begun to change their testing methods to avoid animals.The findings were that 62% of people would approve of testing if little or no pain was experienced by the animals, while 75% disapprove when severe pain is experienced.There is a moral blind spot in the treatment of animals that enable us to justify the cruelties for the perceived benefits of humans. They have lungs which breathe, hearts which beat, and blood that flows.