On the other hand, if the right to travel is found to be more fundamental, then Fred’s right to private property will be limited and Joe will be able to travel across it if he likes.
In other words, when it happens that rights conflict with one another, it is a judge’s job to adjudicate the question of which right is more basic and rule in favor of it.
It is time we all start respecting and protecting it.
Abortion is one of the heaviest topics currently discussed in contemporary American politics. Even great philosophers like Plato and Aristotle weighed in on abortion, arguing its benefits and drawbacks in a democratic society.
Joe could claim, for example, that he has a right to move around freely and go where he likes and that Fred’s exclusive right to property infringes on his own freedom to go where he likes.
Paul Virilio Speed And Politics An Essay On Dromology - Essay About Abortion Pro Life
It is apparent that Fred and Joe’s respective rights are in conflict; if Joe is obliged to respect Fred’s proprietary rights, then Joe’s right to move about as he likes will be hampered.Now we “sacrifice” our unborn children to our modern idols such as money, self-desires and convenience.People are taught that children are expensive, a burden to carry and will prevent them from pursuing their own dreams.This is because, while deliberating this case, the failed to thoroughly perform its duties and, thus, its decision is unfounded.Due to this failure, the decision ought to be overturned, and abortion should be federally illegal until the court does its due diligence and produces a satisfactory and definitive ruling.All people are to be treasured and motherhood received as a gift from the Lord.Not only am I pro-life for the reasons above, but I have also seen first hand how precious life is even when it is small.Of all the rights that can possibly be claimed, an individual’s right to life is the most fundamental. According to legal philosopher Henry Shoe:"Rights of security and subsistence are ‘basic rights’ because they are indispensable for the enjoyment of all other rights” (Wenar). It is important to keep in mind that every right claimed by one party implies that a separate party has a corresponding obligation to respect that right.That is to say, if Fred has a right to private property, then Joe is obliged to keep off of it unless Fred gives him permission.